| |
In the past decade, the
biotechnology industry has a flourishing group of DNA-array
makers, with applications in high-throughput analyses for,
to name a few, gene expression, gene variation, toxicology,
and drug development. The burgeoning arena has lead to the
development of several different strategies for DNA attachment
on the surface. Some companies use in situ synthesis on the
surface to create the different DNA strands one base at a
time. Others completely synthesize the entire strand before
attaching it to the surface. Several substrates have emerged
as favorable choices, glass, silicon, and plastic to name
a few. Our work has centered on creating patterned surfaces
to aid in the development of high-density, highly pure DNA
microarrays.
|



Figure 1: The process of patterning a surface. (a)
We place a solid support that has been coated with gold
into a 1mM ethanolic solution of 11-mercaptaoundecanoic
acid (MUA) for at least 18 hours. The surface is subsequently
covered with poly-L-lysine. The electrostatic interaction
between the carboxylic acid groups of the MUA and the
amine groups on the PL allows PL to bind to the MUA
surface. (b) When the MUA-PL surface is exposed to an
UV light source through a quartz mask, the gold-sulfur
bond between the MUA and the gold surface is oxidized.
(c) Those regions where the UV light was blocked through
the mask are conserved. Rinsing the surface completely
removes the alkanethiol in the exposed areas. (d) When
the surface is immersed into a 1mM ethanolic solution
of n-octyldecyl mercaptan (ODM), the ODM fills the bare
gold regions and transforms the exposed areas into hydrophobic
regions. (e) The surface is then reacted with sulfosuccinimidyl
4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SSMCC)
and finally with 5'-thiol modified DNA. The SSMCC only
reacts with the MUA-PL regions of the surface, not to
the ODM areas, and the 5'-thiol modified DNA will only
react at the SSMCC sites. In addition, the ODM regions
are hydrophobic while the MUA-PL-SSMCC all create hydrophilic
regions. The DNA solutions are confined to specific
areas on the surface through the hydrophobic/hydrophilic
interactions of the patterned sample, and the DNA strands
selectively attach to the surface only on the reactive
MUA-PL-SSMCC sites. |
| Table 1: Contact Angle. The contact angles
of water on a gold surface that has been chemically modified
are recorded. A bare gold surface is exposed to a 1mM
ethanol solution of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) for
18 hours, and after rinsing with water and ethanol, the
contact angle of the surface is measured. The surface
is then exposed to 1mg/ml solution of poly-L-lysine (PL)
for 30 minutes after which the contact angle is recorded.
After the surface is covered with sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)
cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SSMCC) for 30 minutes, the
contact angle is measured. To measure the difference in
surface tension, a bare gold sample is placed in methyl
terminated alkanethiol (octadecyl mercaptan, ODM, or hexadecyl
mercaptan) for 18 hours and then its contact angle is
recorded.
| Surface
|
qH2O
|
|
11-mercaptoundecanoic
acid (MUA) |
58.1+3.54°
|
|
MUA
+ poly-L-lysine (PL) |
34.3+2.44°
|
|
MUA
+ PL + SSMCC |
41.5+1.54°
|
|
n-octadecyl
mercaptan (ODM) |
91.8+1.75°
|
|
| 
Figure
2: A DNA array viewed in fluorescence. (a) Forty-nine
squares with DNA strands attached to the surface at
each array site are created with the process described
in figure 1. We deposited a 0.5mM DNA solution on the
surface and placed a clean coverslip on top of the surface.
The DNA only attached at the array sites and we did
not see any non-specific adsorption onto the background
of the n-octadecyl mercaptan (ODM) film. Each array
site is 500 μm x 500 μm and is separated by
1 mm center to center. We detect the attached DNA at
the array site by flooding the surface with a solution
of the complementary strands that are 5'-fluorescein-labeled
oligonucleotides. When the surface is scanned with a
fluorImager at 530nm, an image of the surface is obtained,
and the areas where there are double-stranded DNA with
the fluorescein-tagged complement are highlighted. (b)
In arbitrary fluorescent units, we scale the intensity
of the signal and represent the intensity in the color
diagram. |
| 
Figure
3: Demonstration
of selectivity in hybridization and isolation to array
elements. Two different DNA solutions are placed with
an automated pin tool onto the patterned surface that
is created as described in figure 1. Confined to the
array site through the difference in surface tension
between the hydrophobic n-octyldecyl mercaptan (ODM)
background layer and the hydrophilic array elements
consisting of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) and poly-L-lysine
(PL), the DNA solutions react with the surface to form
bonds and become tethered. When we place the DNA solution
in a pattern described in (a), we can demonstrate the
selective hybridization of the array elements. After
the DNA solutions have reacted to the surface and have
become bound to the specific array sites, we expose
the entire surface to the 5'-fluorescein-labeled complements
of both. When we scan the surface at 530nm with a fluorImager,
we obtain an image of the surface and the areas where
the DNA strands have formed duplexes with the fluorescein-tagged
complements are highlighted, as seen in (b). We remove
all the of complements though a wash with an 8.3M urea
solution at 40ēC for 20 minutes. When we flood the surface
with the fluorescein-labeled complement of A and image
the surface, the highlighted areas of the image correspond
to the array sites where we placed the DNA solution
A, as seen in (c). We remove the complement of A though
a wash with an 8.3M urea solution at 40ēC for 20 minutes.
When we expose the surface with the fluorescein-labeled
complement of B and image the surface, the highlighted
areas of the image correspond to the array sites where
we placed the DNA solution B, as seen in (d). (e) The
DNA sequence legend for each position on the array.
(f) In arbitrary fluorescent units, we scale the intensity
of the signal and represent the intensity in the color
diagram. The figure shows that each array element can
be individually loaded with a specific DNA solution
and that the solution stays confined in the array site.
When we apply a fluorescent complement, only the array
elements with the corresponding sequence become highlighted.
|
References:
Fodor, S.P.A.; Read, J.L.; Pirrung, M.C.; Stryer,
L.; Tsai, L.A.; Solas, D. Light-Directed, Spatially Addressable
Parallel Chemical Synthesis. Science. 1991, 251, 767-773.
Singh-Gasson, S.; Green, R.D.; Yue, Y.; Nelson, C.; Blattner,
F.; Sussman, M.R.; Cerrina, F. Maskless Fabrication of Light-Directed
Oligonucleotide Microarrays Using Digital Micromirror Array.
Nature Biotechnology. 1999, 17, 974-978.
Shalon D., Gene Expression Micro-Arrays: A New Tool for Genomic
Research. Genome Methods. 1996, 6(7), 639-645.
Schena, M; Shalon, D.; Davis, R.W.; Brown, P.O. Quantitative
Monitoring Of Gene-expression Patterns With A Complementary-DNA
Microarray. Science 270(5235), 467-470 (1995).
Gillmor, S.D.; Thiel, A.J.; Strother, T.C.; Smith, L.M.; Lagally,
M.G. Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Patterned Surfaces as Templates
for DNA Arrays. Langmuir. 16, 7223-7228 (2000).
Strother, T.C.; Cai, W.; Zhao, X.S.; Hamers, R.J.; Smith,
L.M. Synthesis and Characterization of DNA-Modified Silicon
(111) Surfaces. JACS. 2000, 122(6), 1205-1209.
Alizdeh, A.A. et al, Distinct Types of Diffuse Large B-Cell
Lymphoma Identified by Gene Expression Profiling, Nature 403,
503-511 (2000).
Links:
http://www.deathstarinc.com/science/biology/chips.html
http://cmgm.stanford.edu/pbrown/
http://www.affymetrix.com
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/Dynapage.taf?file=/ng/journal/v21/n1s/index.html
For more information on DNA computing, explore these links:
This material is based upon
work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant
No. 9613799. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science
Foundation. |
|